State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
The State appeals part of the trial court's order excluding from evidence in the State's case-in-chief statements Cary Johnson made after a polygraph examination. The State contends that Johnson's statements made after a polygraph examination are fully admissible because they were voluntary noncustodial statements separate from the actual polygraph. Because we conclude that the post-polygraph statements were distinct from the actual mechanical polygraph examination and that Johnson's statements were voluntary, we reverse the part of the trial court's order excluding this evidence from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. WoodsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. TurnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- State v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State v. Adam W. ViceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Jimmie Johnson v. William PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.