Acosta v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CRENSHAW, Judge.
Juan C. Acosta filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida *1180Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court granted the motion and summarily resentenced Acosta. Because Acosta’s resentencing was not a ministerial act, the trial court erred by conducting the resentencing without the presence of Acosta or his counsel.
In 2003, Acosta pleaded no contest to trafficking in cocaine in the amount of four hundred grams or more, possession of cannabis in the amount of twenty grams or more, and possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court adjudicated Acosta…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Bines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Cross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Rivers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- ANTONIO DARWIN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- ANTHONY MCMILLAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Bobby Lee Saviory v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Christopher March Renick v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.