Thibodeau v. Etscovitz Chevrolet
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
39 M.R.S.A. § 65 1 was invoked by this employer-appellant to effect a forfeiture of an injured employee’s compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. 39 M. R.S.A. § 1 rf seq.
After a decision by the Industrial Accident Commissioner adverse to the employer, an appeal was taken to the Superior Court. This appeal is before us from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court sustaining the decision of the Commissioner.
We deny the appeal.
That appellee-employee received a com-pensable injury while in appellant’s employment is not in question. The injury involved a torn cartilage…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jacobsky v. C. D'Alfonso & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Fluor Alaska, Inc. v. MendozaAlaska Supreme Court · 1980