Legal Opinion

George Natkin and Tillie Natkin v. The Exchange National Bank of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 2, 1965No. 14801_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Acting Chief Judge.

Ben Notkin, George Natkin and Tillie Natkin 1 2**commenced this action in the District Court against the defendantappellee, the Exchange National Bank of Chicago. Jurisdiction is predicated on Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.A. § 78aa) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331.

The complaint alleges the bank made loans to Ben Notkin in violation of Regulation U 2 issued by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to Section 7 of the Se curities Exchange Act 3 (15 U.S.C.A. § 78g); that the loans were void under the provisions of Section 29(b) of the Act (15…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,503 Paul S. Dopp v. Franklin National Bank, and Butler Aviation International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Costello v. GrundonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Eastside Church of Christ v. National Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Levin v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API