Legal Opinion
United States v. Kusek
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1986No. S 86 Cr. 83 (SWK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant Luke J. Kusek’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant. Kusek argues that the evidence seized was beyond the scope of the search warrant and not admissible under the “plain view” doctrine. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).1
On February 23, 1984, Judge Ernest L. Alvino of the Superior Court of New Jersey issued a search warrant authorizing a search of the Kusek residence. The search warrant authorized the search of the Kusek…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John Katsougrakis, John HiotisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.