Legal Opinion

Hill v. Reiner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Livingston; Miner, J. Bill by Aurelia Hill against Matilda Reiner and others for partition. From a decree for complainant, defendant Reiner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

The bill in this cause was filed for a partition of certain lands in Livingston county and for an accounting by defendant Matilda Reiner forrents collected, also for delivery by her into court of a certain deed in her possession, through which complainant and defendants derive title, and which said defendant refuses to produce or record. The facts are not disputed.

On December 14, 1907, Adelaide J. Holdridge, of the village of Brighton, Mich., an old lady without living children, desirous of disposing of her property by will, was advised by a friend, formerly a banker, that to dispose of it by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Sanborn v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. City of Detroit v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King County v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. The People v. VarelIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Garrett v. EllisonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. King County v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API