Legal Opinion

Rauber v. Zinner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 27, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was a dealer in new and second-hand automobiles. The defendant was driving one of the plaintiff’s cars when the damages occurred for which there was recovery. Since the defendant contemplated the purchase of the car and was trying it out; it is conceded that there was a bailment for the mutual benefit of the parties to the action. The bailee was, therefore, liable for ordinary negligence. Kittay v. Cordasco, 103 N. J. L. 156. However, since the car was in good condition when taken out, and when returned it was damaged, a prima facie case was established which put the bailee to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  2. Nelson v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Kushner v. President of Atlantic City, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API