Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ziegenhein v. Tittmann

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. (1) Where there is a right there will be a remedy, and, if none be given, one will be implied. “Ubi jus, ibi remediumP State v. Severance, 55 Mo. 378; Carondelet v. Picot, 38 Mo. 125 ; Camden v. Allen, 2 Butcher, 398 ; Dillon on Mun.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. (1) Where there is a right there will be a remedy, and, if none be given, one will be implied. “Ubi jus, ibi remediumP State v. Severance, 55 Mo. 378; Carondelet v. Picot, 38 Mo. 125 ; Camden v. Allen, 2 Butcher, 398 ; Dillon on Mun. Corp. [ 3 Ed.] sec. 818 ; Householder v. City of Kansas, 83 Mo. 488 ; Greely v. Bank, 98 Mo. 458. (2) A bill in equity may contain but one count; and it may include several legal causes of action, all constituting but a single equitable cause of action. Mo. Prac. [Green & Meyer] sec. 893. (3) The city and board of public…

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is a suit to recover delinquent state, city and school taxes assessed on personalty lor the years running from 1877 to 1884, inclusive. Throughout the period named, one William C. Jamison was administrator of the estate of A. Tholozan, and, as such, had received into his possession the personal property, the assessments upon which are the basis for this suit. This property, with which Jamison was chargeable as such administrator, varied in amoimt from year to year. In December, 1884, Jamison’s letters were revoked, and thereupon respondent was appointed, and is now, the administrator of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Christal v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Gamble v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Circuit Attorney v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Trustees of General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church v. McElhinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Williams v. Heirs of PettigrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jordan v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Matson v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Karrenbrock v. Mississippi Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Nichols v. ReyburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Zeideman v. MolaskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API