Kinnaman-Carson v. Westport Insurance Corp.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITCH, Chief Justice.
This case presents the question whether an insurer can contest coverage in a garnishment action despite its agreement to defend the underlying tort suit without a reservation of rights. The insurer claims it can because it was unaware at the time it made its agreement that judgment already had been entered in the suit it was agreeing to defend. This Court holds that, to the contrary, the insurer’s agreement to defend without reservation precludes it from later asserting a coverage defense in the garnishment action. The insurer should have resolved any issues…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Southers v. City of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Prairie Framing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Coffer v. Wasson-HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BallmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Franklin Allen v. Wayne Bryers, Atain Specialty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Dilley v. ValentineMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Advantage Buildings & Exteriors, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co. v. TalbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Inman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.