Legal Opinion

Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 13, 2016No. 16-1793PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

About a decade ago, Jakeffe Holt was convicted of possessing a firearm- despite prior convictions that barred gun ownership. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Several of those convictions led the district court to deem him an armed career criminal, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and impose a 200-month sentence,

Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), holds that the residual clause in § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is unconstitutionally vague. Holt then launched a collateral attack on his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Section 924(e) applies to persons with three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew MarskeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Anthony Potter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. In re ConzelmannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API