Holt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
About a decade ago, Jakeffe Holt was convicted of possessing a firearm- despite prior convictions that barred gun ownership. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Several of those convictions led the district court to deem him an armed career criminal, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and impose a 200-month sentence,
Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), holds that the residual clause in § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is unconstitutionally vague. Holt then launched a collateral attack on his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Section 924(e) applies to persons with three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew MarskeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Anthony Potter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- In re ConzelmannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.