Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Allen

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided October 11, 1951No. Civ. No. 652Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Judge.

This is an action for the refund of income and estate taxes paid after deficiency .assessments by the Commissioner. All of £he ¡deficiency assessments grew out of a ruling by the Commissioner that A. O. Blalock was not a valid partner for income tax purposes in four business concerns, known as Blalock Machinery and Equipment Company, Sand and Gravel Products Company, Central Sand and Asphalt Company, and Coffee Construction Company and Associates.

In 1925, D. B. Blalock and his wife, Estelle ,Z. Blalock, formed a partnership, known as the Blalock Machinery and Equipment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Ginsburg Et Ux. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API