Legal Opinion

J.L. v. G.M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 1997No. Nos. 96-2740, 96-2875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We grant certiorari review of two orders that allowed nonparties to intervene in a dependency proceeding. After the petition for dependency was filed by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services,1 the trial court granted motions to intervene filed by the child’s maternal grandmother and maternal aunt and uncle.

We have certiorari jurisdiction to review such orders because they pose a risk of irreparable harm to both the parents and the children. This could arise not only from interference with petitioners’ parental rights, but also with the actions deemed necessary by the Department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beagle v. BeagleSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. DoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J.P. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. State, Department of Children & Families v. Interest of B.D.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. McGillis v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Jl v. GmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API