Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SAM ANDREWS'SONS v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1988No. L.A. 32129Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BROUSSARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the judgment. I also join in Justice Arguelles’s discussion of the issues of costs and attorney fees. I write separately, however, to express my disagreement with the majority’s analysis of restrictions on union access to labor camps. In a case in which the court upholds a decision by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) finding the grower’s restriction on labor camp access invalid, the majority have managed to write an opinion more con*185cerned with the hypothetical rights of the grower than with the violated rights of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API