SAM ANDREWS'SONS v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BROUSSARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the judgment. I also join in Justice Arguelles’s discussion of the issues of costs and attorney fees. I write separately, however, to express my disagreement with the majority’s analysis of restrictions on union access to labor camps. In a case in which the court upholds a decision by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) finding the grower’s restriction on labor camp access invalid, the majority have managed to write an opinion more con*185cerned with the hypothetical rights of the grower than with the violated rights of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.