Legal Opinion

In Re the Claim of Berger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated. The board’s determination that the employer-employee relationship continued until the claimant exhausted all of his leave credits was rational and should not be disturbed (Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146, 150, 153).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Gabrielli and Cooke dissent and vote to affirm on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (53 AD2d 730).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hock v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Gonzalez v. Progressive Tool & Die Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. In re the Claim of RappaportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. In re the Claim of JowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Lottman v. Piper Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API