Legal Opinion

Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Albert

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 2004No. 2003-1420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

pAMY, Judge.

A parish police jury filed suit against the defendant sugar-cane farmers, alleging that the defendants’ harvesting operations damaged a parish road. The police jury *69sought to recover amounts expended to repair the damaged road. A bench trial was held in the matter, in which the judge dismissed the police jury’s cause of action on the basis that the defendants could not have reasonably foreseen that their harvesting operations would cause damage to the road. From this judgment, the police jury appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

According…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Davis v. WittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. Forest v. STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Abby Gail Garcie v. City of NatchitochesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Delton Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API