Legal Opinion

William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey Hayes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2018No. Court of Appeals Case 49A02-1711-CT-2595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robb, Judge.

[1] In Harr v. Hayes , 106 N.E.3d 515 , 2018 WL 3234184 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018), we held, in part, that where William R. Harr and Harr's employer, Finster Courier, Inc., d/b/a/ Elite Express (collectively, "Defendants"), failed to establish diversity jurisdiction in a removal action, under the specific facts presented, the doctrines of judicial estoppel, waiver, and/or judicial admission were inapplicable to limit a subsequent judgment in state court. Accordingly, we affirmed the trial court's denial of the Defendants' motion to correct error seeking modification of the judgment. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Americhina, LLC v. Marion County Auditor and Marion County Treasurer (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. Rick C. Sasso, M.D. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API