Legal Opinion

Roddenberry v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 26, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

There are four phases of .the challenge to the .validity of the judgment of conviction against the appellant, William Roddenberry, for killing a person by driving an automobile while intoxicated. One of them concerns the constitutionality of the act denouncing the offense of which he was found guilty; one, the adequacy of the second count of the information to allege the crime; one, the sufficiency of the evidence to justify a verdict against him; and, one, the propriety of the court’s charge to the jury.

It is the position of the appellant that Chapter 11809, Laws of Florida, Acts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Landis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Milton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Finn v. FinnSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. State v. HubbardSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API