Roddenberry v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, J.:
There are four phases of .the challenge to the .validity of the judgment of conviction against the appellant, William Roddenberry, for killing a person by driving an automobile while intoxicated. One of them concerns the constitutionality of the act denouncing the offense of which he was found guilty; one, the adequacy of the second count of the information to allege the crime; one, the sufficiency of the evidence to justify a verdict against him; and, one, the propriety of the court’s charge to the jury.
It is the position of the appellant that Chapter 11809, Laws of Florida, Acts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Landis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Milton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
3Cited by13 opinions
- Finn v. FinnSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- State v. HubbardSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.