Kandice Gray v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KANDICE GRAY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00630-MCS-PLA 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 12 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 13 v. 14 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE 15 INSURANCE COMPANY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 This is an action for recovery of benefits under a disability plan governed by the 20 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. § 1001
et 21 seq. (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1.) The parties agreed to present the case on cross- 22 motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. (Joint Scheduling Conference…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Joseph Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Ioane John Opeta v. Northwest Airlines Pension Plan for Contract EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Armani v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.