Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Shamis v. James Moon C/O Geppert Brothers, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 2013Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION BY

STRASSBURGER, J.:

I agree with the Majority’s analysis of the merits of the issues before this Court. I write separately to opine that Geppert Brothers should be estopped to raise the borrowed servant doctrine based upon its abuse of the process of Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) participation in the contract.

It is the policy of this Commonwealth “to increase the utilization of minority and women-owned businesses and other disadvantaged businesses in all competitive contracting opportunities.” 4 Pa.Code § 1.453. Various governments within the *974Commonwealth have sought to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Titus v. Mapel-Sterling Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API