Rautenstrauch v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
The defendants were indicted for the possession of marijuana. Their general demurrers to the indictment, motions to suppress evidence and for discovery were overruled. A certificate of immediate review was granted.
l.In Georgia there is no statute nor any rule of practice allowing pretrial discovery and inspection of evidence, and possession of evidence, by defendant or his counsel. Blevins v. State, 220 Ga. 720 (2) (141 SE2d 426); Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46 (1) (172 SE2d 395); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 (2) (185 SE2d 90). The trial court properly denied the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ezzard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. CumbaaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Blevins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Whitlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Budhani v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Mobley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Rasnake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Budhani v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.