Lance v. City of Sulphur
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Vice Chief Justice:
The basic issue in this appeal is whether, on the basis of Appellants’ evidence, the City of Sulphur, Oklahoma, took the procedural steps necessary as conditions precedent to its exercise of the power to create Sewer District No. 36. The City might have proceeded under any one of three statutory plans: One plan (11 O.S. 1961, § 270.6 et seq., Supp.1963) is initiated whenever the record owners of more than one-half (½) the area of the land liable to said assessments petition the governing *868body of the City for the establishment of a sanitary sewer district. The other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Coalgate v. GentiliniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Riedt v. City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Bonney v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Horton v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- E & F Cox Family Trust v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979