Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Munoz
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 23, 2005No. 03-16216PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Francisco Munoz (“Munoz”) and Alberto Liona (“Liona”) appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to violate the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and six related counts of mail fraud. The charges stem from a scheme to sell, through telemarketing and without prescriptions, two treatments for erectile dysfunction. Appellants challenge their convictions on several grounds, including sufficiency of the evidence. Appellants also argue that their sentences were improperly enhanced on the basis of an incorrect loss calculation and in violation of United…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Dewey M. HamakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Mahendra Pratap GuptaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Artemus E. Ward, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Charles EmorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.