Brancaccio v. Jackal Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentJorgenson, Judge
I respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial must be reversed due to the undisputed fact that nonevidentiary materials were given to the jury during deliberations. Moreover, there is a sufficient record from which it can be determined that the error was prejudicial and that a new trial is required.
Brancaccio sued Jackal Corporation’s restaurant for injuries sustained when he slipped and fell while departing the restaurant. Plaintiff contended that he slipped on a wet rubber mat on the inclined surface of the restaurant’s exit/entrance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Foster v. FillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bottoson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Larkins v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Pryor v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.