Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramiro Molina

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1985No. 84-2547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

In this suit by the United States to foreclose its tax lien against the homestead of Ramiro and Anita B. Molina, the United States was awarded a judgment of $163,-778.39. The district court ordered foreclosure and sale of the homestead but Anita Molina, who was not separately liable for the taxes, was awarded 36.669 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the property as compensation for her homestead interest, 584 F.Supp. 1011. The United States appeals, claiming that the district court overvalued her homestead interest in the property. Agreeing with the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sarah M. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. MolinaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Rudie William Pletz, Debtor. Rudie William Pletz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Gary CardaciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. BarczykDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. United States v. GoddardDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API