Legal Opinion

United States v. One Package

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The United States of America, as libel-ant, seeks a decree directing the forfeiture, confiscation, and destruction of a package containing rubber pessaries for the prevention of conception alleged to have been imported into the United States from a foreign country in violation of section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.A. § 1305).

The claimant, Dr. Hannah M. Stone, a duly licensed physician, specializing in gynecology, imported the libeled articles for experimental purposes to determine their reliability and usefulness as contraceptives to cure or prevent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. DennettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Youngs Rubber Corporation v. CI Lee & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1891
  5. Dysart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HelbockDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API