Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kennicott Bros. v. Fidanovski (In Re Fidanovski)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 4, 2006No. 19-02349PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A. BENJAMIN GOLDGAR, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the court for ruling is the motion of plaintiff Kennicott Brothers Co. pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) (made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7015), to file an amended complaint objecting to the discharge of debtors Tom and Svetlana Fidanovski. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.

1. Background

Kennicott Brothers Co. is a wholesale florist with a business location in Wauke-gan, Illinois, and perhaps elsewhere. In its initial complaint, Kennicott alleged that Svetlana…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Valerie Bennett v. Marie SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stanziale v. Dalmia (In Re Allserve Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  2. Regis Technologies, Inc. v. Oien (In Re Oien)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Kovacs v. United States (In Re Kovacs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
  4. In re: Sajid A. Ravasia and Debra J. RavasiaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. In re: Waseem Khan v. Patrick S. Layng, U.S. TrusteeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API