Legal Opinion

Horvath v. Niacet Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion granted. Memorandum: The court erred in refusing to grant plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on his claim under Labor Law § 240. The duty imposed on the owner under that section is not satisfied by proof that a safety belt and line were available at the bottom of a gang box at the jobsite and that plaintiff could have used it (Heath v Soloff Constr., 107 AD2d 507). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heath v. Soloff Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lickers v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Ferra v. County of WayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Morehouse v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988