Legal Opinion

United States v. Tucker, Darin

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 26, 2004No. 03-3139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROBERTS.

ROBERTS, Circuit Judge:

The district judge in this case declined to sentence the defendant according to the Sentencing Guidelines because he disagreed with the Guidelines. As the judge put it, he was “not going to be the instrument of injustice in this case.” Presen-tence Hearing Tr. at 4 (July 18, 2003). The Supreme Court has explained that “ ‘[sjimple justice’ is achieved when a complex body of law developed over a period of years is evenhandedly applied.” Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 401, 101 S.Ct. 2424, 2429, 69…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Kelvin HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. JACK WAYNE ROGERS, DEFENDANT—APPELLANTCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Jack Wayne RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API