Legal Opinion

Cote v. Michou

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 4, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Defendant’s counsel in argument made the following statement: “Ele told us [Dr. Smith] on the authority they are going on, — 'why, certainly,’ he says, 'I couldn’t have saved her life, and the best doctor in the world couldn’t have saved her life.’ ” Exception by the plaintiff.

The testimony of Dr. Smith, who was the plaintiff’s witness, relative to the matter under discussion was as follows:

“ Q. You can’t save a life every time you have a case of eclampsia? A. No. Q. You can’t say that Dr. Michou, or any doctor, you or any number of doctors, could have saved this woman’s life once these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Benoit v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  3. Greenfield v. KennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  4. Hallock v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Lemay v. DemersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Capitol Motor Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. Haselton v. MaserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  3. Kerzty v. WardymkaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API