Tate v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of murder, found two enhancement allegations to be true, and assessed punishment at 60 years imprisonment.
Appellant asserts that reversible error occurred when the prosecutor cross-examined his co-defendant about an extraneous offense in which appellant was implicated.
Appellant was tried jointly with his son and co-defendant, Terrence Eugene Tate, whose appeal is pending before another panel of this Court. Tate v. State, No. 01-87-00612-CR.
Appellant and Terrence Tate were represented by different attorneys. Appellant did not testify.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scruggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- George S. Manning, M.D. v. Luis Ornelas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Jeremy Huneycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Jeremy Huneycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Jeremy Huneycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.