Legal Opinion

Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1930No. 5580PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Raymond Holt, was the foreman of the garage, dispatcher and general office man of the Chicago-Detroit Express Company, which company operated a motor trucking business between Detroit and Chicago. He was not a stockholder or officer of the corporation, but, under the title of assistant secretary, he had power to sign checks, employ additional trucks to handle freight, furnish drivers with expense money, quote and fix rates, make out waybills, and generally' direct and facilitate the movement of freight. On May 8, 1929, he employed two additional men,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Schmeller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  5. Frantz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API