Jarnigan v. State

On Rehearing.

On rehearing appellant insists that the judgment of conviction is totally void, in that two minimum terms of imprisonment are fixed and no maximum term. We accord no merit to this insistence, it being clearly apparent that the discrepancy complained of is a mere clerical misprision and is self-corrective. Moreover, the matter complained of has no connection whatever with the adjudication of guilt. It appears affirmatively that this appellant was duly and legally adjudged guilty by the court. If the misprision so earnestly insisted upon was of sufficient import to be seriously…