Legal Opinion

Spear v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1987No. 863SC740PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend the court erred in granting defendants’ motion for directed verdict against their claim for breach of contract. We agree as to plaintiffs’ claim against defendant Daniel Homes, Inc.

The dispositive question is whether plaintiffs waived their rights under the contract by moving into the residence prior to payment of the final installment due under the contract. Plaintiffs’ evidence was clearly sufficient for submission to the jury unless plaintiffs, as a matter of law, waived their rights under the contract.

Paragraph #9 of the 8 September Agreement provides:

9.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Charlotte Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Raleigh Paint & Wallpaper Co. v. James T. Rogers Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hageman v. Twin City Chrysler-Plymouth Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API