Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Hood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892No. 15,487PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

Proceedings for laying out a highway were prosecuted before the board of commissioners of Vermillion county. The appellant did not appear, but, after the decision of the board in favor of the petitioners, appealed *595the case to the circuit court. In that court it offered to file a remonstrance, but the court denied its request. In support of its offer an affidavit was filed. The appellees insist that the affidavit shows no excuse for the failure to file the remonstrance before the board of commissioners. The affidavit states that a former attempt to open the highway was prevented by an order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Forsythe v. KreuterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lowe v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Metty v. MarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wells v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ely v. City of MontpelierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Strayer v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API