Legal Opinion

Swalberg v. Hannegan

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 21, 1994No. 930313-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Defendant minor challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment ordering him to restore plaintiff adult to his precón-tractual status, although defendant had disaf-firmed his contract with plaintiff. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment, “we accept the facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the losing party.” Winegar v. Froerer Corp., 813 P.2d 104, 107 (Utah 1991). We recite the facts accordingly.

In 1990, defendant contracted with plaintiff to purchase plaintiffs 1974 Ford truck for $2,500.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Blake v. HardingUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Merchants' Credit Bureau v. AkiyamaUtah Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API