Legal Opinion
Lines v. Bank of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1972No. 26296PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The bankrupt gave appellee’s predecessor in interest a chattel mortgage on personal property to secure a loan. A financing statement was filed with the Secretary of State pursuant to section 9401(c) of the California Commercial Code to perfect the security interest. The trustee contends that the security interest is invalid because the financing statement did not contain the residence address of the debtor as required by section 9402(1) of the Code.
The referee rejected this contention after an evidentiary hearing, for the following reasons. The financing statement contained all of the other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bourland v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Thomas v. GoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- John J. Rooney, Trustee in the Matter of James Bernard Johnson and Dolores June Johnson, Bankrupts v. Thomas F. Mason and Doris G. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Mccauley's Reprographics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aurora Mobile Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Lines v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972