Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Cork

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. 79938-5PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 — A child and his mother are from Montana but moved to Washington. The child’s former foster parents, still living in Montana, asked Washington courts to grant them custody. Washington has adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), ch. 26.27 RCW. See also Unif. Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act, 9 pt. IAU.L.A. 655 (1997). Under that act, because the foster parents live in Montana and seek to modify a custody determination initially made by Montana, and because Montana has never declined jurisdiction, Washington courts do not have jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. S.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re A.F.-C.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Custody of ACCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of McDermottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Mecum v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Ralph v. Department of Natural ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ruff v. KnickerbockerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Franklin v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API