Legal Opinion

Fairfield Dev v. Totowa Borough

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided September 30, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BIANCO, J.T.C.

This opinion constitutes the court’s decision with respect to the motions filed by defendant, Totowa Borough (“Totowa”), seeking to dismiss the Complaints of plaintiffs, Fairfield Dev c/o 46 Auto Imports (“Fairfield”) and Anton & Simon Schweighardt (“Schweighardts”), in the above captioned matters. Because the issues presented in both cases are identical, we join them for the purposes of this opinion. For the reasons set forth below, Totowa’s motions are denied.

FACTS

Both taxpayers operate income producing property in Totowa. On September 10, 2012, and September 11, 2012, Totowa…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saij Realty Inc. v. Town of KearnyNew Jersey Tax Court · 1986
  2. Southland Corp. v. Dover TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
  3. ADP of New Jersey, Inc. v. Parsippanytroy Hills Tp.New Jersey Tax Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 440 Rt 17 Ptrns LLC v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsNew Jersey Tax Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API