Legal Opinion
In re St. Lawrence Transmission Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Alden Chester,
Referee. These several proceedings have been tried together. The proceedings for 1921, 1922 and 1923 were brought by the St. Lawrence Transmission Company as relator and the proceedings since that date were brought by the St. Lawrence Valley Power Corporation as relator, all covering the same real property, the corporate name of the first named relator having been changed to that of the last named relator prior to the assessment of 1924 but such change resulted in no change of interest or ownership.
In each of the eight proceedings the relator claims that the assessment is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- People Ex Rel. Eckerson v. . ZundelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People Ex Rel. George Kemp Real Estate Co. v. O'DonnelNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People Ex Rel. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . MealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- People ex rel. New York Dock Co. v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People ex rel. 180 Varick Street Corp. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1937