Merchants' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance v. Washington Mutual Insurance
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stoker, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendants at the time the cause of action is alleged to have arisen, were both incorporated companies under the laws of Ohio, and transacted business in Cincinnati.
On the 26th of October, 1847, the plaintiffs, having previously taken a fire risque of $8000, for the benefit of D. White & Co., on stock of flour, grain, and cooperage contained in their “stone and brick steam-flouring mill," with cement roof, and detached from all other buildings, situated in the city ’of Madison, Indiana, and known as the City Mills,” applied to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Ætna Fire Insurance v. TylerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Fish v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Jefferson Insurance v. H. & D. Cotheal.New York Supreme Court · 1831
- Merry v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. ShearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1882
- Matthews v. Queen City InsuranceOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1872