Legal Opinion

Balley v. Davis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1954No. 8021, 8022PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Chief Justice.

This action was commenced in Canyon County on January 29, 1951. In their complaint, respondents allege that appellants and respondents entered into a contract whereby appellants agreed to drill a deep well on the land of respondents; and that appellants breached such contract to the damage of respondents in the particulars set out in the complaint. The complaint also alleges “That J. E. Davis, E. C. Davis, and L. A. Davis were operating as a co-partnership at the times” mentioned in the complaint.

Service of summons was made upon J. E. Davis and L. A. Davis. These…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Roden v. RodenArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Steele v. WardwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. v. Bernard EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Seafirst Center Ltd. Partnership v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Eastern Electrical Co. v. Taylor Woodrow Blitman Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Simpson v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API