Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Transportation v. Olshan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1976No. 30921Published

1DissentUndercofler, Presiding Justice

The property being condemned is subject to five separate security deeds on five separate portions. There is one overall appraisal and one deposit for prepayment purposes. But the five security deed holders must litigate among themselves to apportion the deposit before they can exercise their prepayment rights. To them the prepayment rights are meaningless. This is not the intent of the statute requiring prepayment deposits nor the *218constitutional provision under which it was adopted. To give them meaning the state must make separate appraisals under the circumstances here. However, I see no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Kennedy v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. State v. HemmingsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API