Legal Opinion

People v. French Bottling Works, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal calls into question the validity of the provision of the Sanitary Code (§ 139-b) in force in the city of New York relative to labeling bottled nonalcoholic carbonated beverages, which requires the dealer to indicate the presence of “ saccharin or other synthetic sweetening agent ” on the bottle or container or cap.

The Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, ch. 466, amd. by Laws of 1904, ch. 628, § 3) authorizes the Board of Health to embrace in the Sanitary Code “ all matters and subjects to which, and so far as, the power and authority of said department of health extends, not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Antikamnia Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People v. Excelsior Bottling Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. People v. JacobowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. BeckNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wells v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. Longo, New York County Courts1957
  5. Hill Packing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API