Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

The Boeing Company v. Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (Swapa) on Behalf of Itself and Its Members

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2025No. 22-0631Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0631 ══════════ The Boeing Company, Petitioner, v. Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) on behalf of itself and its members, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BLAND, joined by Justice Huddle, dissenting in part. Our Court carefully scrutinizes assignments of legal causes of action because such assignments uncouple the damages suffered from the party seeking recompense in court. 1 And in other ways,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API