Legal Opinion

Hester v. . Burton

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1801Published

1Opinion of the Court

The execution was irregular. If there had been a cessat executis to a certain time, execution might have been taken out after that time without asci. fa., but here no certain time for the stay of execution is mentioned. The plaintiff might have taken it out the next moment after the entry. The entry makes no difference. If in the present case he can take out execution after the year, there is the same reason for his taking it out after any length of time whatever.

Execution set aside.

NOTE. — See note to Perkins v. Ballenger, 2 N.C. 367, and, in addition to the cases there referred to, see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dawson v. . ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  2. AnonymousSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1796

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API