Legal Opinion

United States v. Esquivel-Cortes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1989No. 88-1669; Nos. 88-2478, 88-2646, 88-2648, 88-2740 and 88-5628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

In each of these six cases, consolidated by the court for disposition, the appellant was convicted of a felony offense and sentenced to a term within the Sentencing Guidelines promulgated in accordance with the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3551 etseq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 991-998. The challenges to the constitutionality of the Sentencing Reform Act, the United States Sentencing Commission, and the Sentencing Guidelines, which appellants advance, were rejected in United States v. Mistretta, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). Only appellants’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Darrell EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Irineo Esquivel-Cortes, United States of America v. Barbara Lopez, United States of America v. Adriana P. Alaniz, United States of America v. Miguel Angel Sensebe, United States of America v. Alfonso Martinez-Flores, United States of America v. Daniel Gilbert DeeringCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API