Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronnie Bryser and Vincent Degerolamo, Gerald Degerolamo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 12, 1996No. 1587, Docket 95-1571PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

On petition for rehearing, we hold that our decision does not conflict with the holding in United States v. Oliveras, 905 F.2d 623 (2d Cir.1990).

The petition for rehearing is denied.

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

After the denial of rehearing by the panel and in response to DeGerolamo’s suggestion for rehearing in banc, the matter was referred back to the panel to address the argument that United States v. Oliveras, 905 F.2d 623 (2d Cir.1990), requires reversal. We write to indicate why we believe that Oliver-as is entirely distinguishable. Familiarity with our prior decision,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Julio OliverasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Ronnie Bryser and Vincent Degerolamo, Gerald DegerolamoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  2. Slayton v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API