Legal Opinion
Uher v. Uher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A party seeking downward modification of a child support obligation has the burden of establishing a change in circumstances (see Matter of Dinhofer v Zabezhanskaya, 79 AD3d 1039, 1040 [2010]; Matter of Piernick v Nazinitsky, 48 AD3d 690 [2008]). “A parent’s loss of employment may constitute a change of circumstances warranting a downward modification of child support if it is demonstrated that the noncustodial parent has diligently sought reemployment” (Matter of McAndrew v McAndrew, 84 AD3d 1381, 1382 [2011]; see Ritchey v Ritchey, 82 AD3d 948, 949 [2011]). Here, however, the father failed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piernick v. NazinitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- D'Altilio v. D'AltilioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Dinhofer v. ZabezhanskayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Betancourt v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ritchey v. RitcheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ashmore v. AshmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Ashmore v. AshmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014