Keller ex rel. Compton v. Eagle Army-Navy Department Stores, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam 1
We reverse the trial court judgment which dismissed what was in fact the fourth complaint filed by the plaintiff. While we agree that the complaint was in-artful, far from being a model, and certainly borderline as to legal sufficiency, we feel from our review of the cases and criteria contained therein 1 that the complaint was at least adequate at this stage to state a cause of action in breach of warranty. The action was brought against a retailer by an injured person not in privity, based upon the notion that the injury was caused by a dangerous instrumentality.2
We specifically do not here…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Toombs v. Fort Pierce Gas CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Cohn v. Florida-Georgia Television CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keller v. Eagle Army-Navy Dept. Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Iorio v. LaymanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Snead Construction Corp. v. Parkway East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Dudley v. Mae's Discount FabricsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Eagle Army-Navy Department Stores, Inc. v. Keller ex rel. ComptonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.