Legal Opinion

Keller ex rel. Compton v. Eagle Army-Navy Department Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1971No. 71-241PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam 1

We reverse the trial court judgment which dismissed what was in fact the fourth complaint filed by the plaintiff. While we agree that the complaint was in-artful, far from being a model, and certainly borderline as to legal sufficiency, we feel from our review of the cases and criteria contained therein 1 that the complaint was at least adequate at this stage to state a cause of action in breach of warranty. The action was brought against a retailer by an injured person not in privity, based upon the notion that the injury was caused by a dangerous instrumentality.2

We specifically do not here…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Toombs v. Fort Pierce Gas CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  4. Cohn v. Florida-Georgia Television CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keller v. Eagle Army-Navy Dept. Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Iorio v. LaymanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Snead Construction Corp. v. Parkway East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Dudley v. Mae's Discount FabricsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Eagle Army-Navy Department Stores, Inc. v. Keller ex rel. ComptonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API