Legal Opinion

United States v. Orlando Caicedo-Llanos

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 8, 1992No. 90-3165PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Orlando Caicedo-Llanos appeals his conviction for possession of over 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute. He argues that the government’s failure to preserve and produce certain photographic evidence violated his due process rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and his discovery rights under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For reasons detailed below, we reject both arguments and affirm.

I. Background

A. Facts

Consistent with the findings of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. United States v. Perry A. Graham, United States of America v. Terrence A. Terrell, United States of America v. Roger v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. FemiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. AdefehintiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API